Rapid AI Transformation

You bought the licenses. Now get the return.

Claude Code and Codex only compound when they're wired into how your team ships: your conventions, your review gates, your tests. We do that wiring inside your repositories, with your engineers.

What it is

The model isn't the gap.

The pattern is familiar. Licenses go out, there's a burst of enthusiasm, and then a plateau. Two engineers become power users. Everyone else generates code they don't trust enough to merge, goes back to typing it by hand, and the tooling spend renews anyway.

What's missing is never the model. It's that nobody has encoded how this codebase expects work to be done, so every engineer re-explains the project from scratch, badly. We work inside your repositories: agent instructions that carry your conventions, review and test gates that make generated code safe to merge, and the unglamorous parts - CI, secrets, permissions - set up so the whole team can use them. Then we hand it over documented, so the practice survives us leaving.

What happens

Three things, in this order.

01

Baseline

Where the hours go today, so the return gets measured against your own numbers.

02

Wire it in

Repo-level agent instructions, guardrails, test and review gates, CI. Generated code clears the same bar as hand-written code.

03

Spread it

Working sessions with the whole team, not a lunch-and-learn. The engineers who were skeptical are the ones worth convincing.

Get started

Tell us what your team ships in a week.

Bring one repository and one sprint. That's enough to see where agents take work off your engineers, and where they'd only add review load.