Builders who wield agents and move numbers
Engineers, designers, and product managers, each running fleets of agents. The person who scopes your problem is the person who builds the system.
This page is about the humans who run the software factory.
Engineers, designers, and product managers, each running fleets of agents. The person who scopes your problem is the person who builds the system.
First the agents map how your work actually flows. Then we build software levers on the systems you already run. Nothing gets ripped out. Everything gets faster.
Agents give the work superhuman throughput; senior humans hold the quality bar. A named person signs off on everything that ships.
We started realfast after ChatGPT, not before it, so there was never a services org to bolt AI onto. Every role, every process, every metric was designed assuming agents do the building. That's the factory: AI-native from the first commit.
The humans sit with the customer, shape the strategy, and cut it into an execution plan. The agents take it from there, with the humans managing them the way you'd run a team of very fast, very literal engineers: brief, review, correct, repeat.
We want our customers pulling off moves their competitors call impossible, again and again and again.
Read Sidu's thesis >"People call us when the deadline is impossible and the board is watching."
Four or five exceptional people with agent leverage out-ship teams several times their size. We've done it on enough engagements that it stopped being a claim and became the operating model. We hire slowly and pay at the top of the market, because one wrong hire, magnified by agents, can undo the work of all.
The leverage is unforgiving, so we don't rush it.
It's reducing ambiguity faster than the next person. The bar has three parts, and the last one is what separates people.
The thesis updates every three months. We hire people who make good calls on incomplete data and update as new evidence arrives.
Not autocomplete. Directing a model through a real piece of work end to end, prompts, evals, review loops, to a quality bar.
Prose is the visible surface of how you think. The agents amplify whatever you hand them. Muddy writing, muddy work.
Think you clear the bar? Apply through your agent >
From our superagile manifesto, the way an AI-native firm actually ships.
Licenses bought and dashboards lit describe activity, not outcomes. Before any code, we find the number the customer wants moved. If we don't move it, we haven't done the job.
AI compounds whatever process you point it at. Redesign first and it gets dramatically faster. Skip it and you just run the old bottlenecks at higher speed.
Agents write a lot of what ships. A person signs off on all of it: in the work, in the docs, in the audit trail. It's the only honest way to run this.
Something usable ships every week. By Friday the customer can use what we built; Monday's improvement is already scoped.
Our people don't hand off between thinking and shipping. The person who scopes the problem with you is the person who builds the system that solves it: strategist and engineer in the same seat, agents on the muscle.
If that's the work you want, not the story of it, we'd like to hear from you.